State enforcement service resolution about completion of enforcement proceeding was cancelled by our appeal, the SES has been ordered to carry out enforcement actions.

According to a court judgement a debtor was obliged to make recalculation and to pay plaintiff the amount for the Pension Fund’s budget.
In absence of allocation the amount was not paid. For the same reason the State Enforcement Service completed enforcement proceedings without payment recovery.
The Kyiv Appeal Administrative Court has overturned the resolution of SES by our complaint.
Court of appeal has ordered SES to perform enforcement actions for execution the initial judgement.
Pysarenko Law Office Services Contacts

Appeals on tax inspections and actions of tax inspection offices in Ukraine

Pysarenko Oleksandr, Attorney-at-Law, MBA Degree.
Pysarenko Law Office, Kiev, Ukraine.

The legislation provides significantly different order of enforcement of the judgment, which charged state body with damages, compared with the usual order of execution of court decisions. According to P.2, Art.3 of the Law “On Enforcement Proceedings” decisions on Read more

Appeals on tax inspections and actions of tax inspection offices in Ukraine

Pysarenko Oleksandr, Attorney-at-Law, MBA Degree.
Pysarenko Law Office, Kiev, Ukraine.

The legislation provides significantly different order of enforcement of the judgment, which charged state body with damages, compared with the usual order of execution of court decisions. According to P.2, Art.3 of the Law “On Enforcement Proceedings” decisions on Read more

Appeals on tax inspections and actions of tax inspection offices in Ukraine

Pysarenko Oleksandr, Attorney-at-Law, MBA Degree.
Pysarenko Law Office, Kiev, Ukraine.

The legislation provides significantly different order of enforcement of the judgment, which charged state body with damages, compared with the usual order of execution of court decisions. According to P.2, Art.3 of the Law “On Enforcement Proceedings” decisions on Read more

Contracts declared void on the demand of the tax authority (levy of execution to the benefit of the government). Yuridicheskaya Praktika legal practice neswpaper No. 35 (297) 2003, p. 7

Oleksandr Pysarenko.

Especially for the Yuridicheskaya Praktika neswpaper.

In February 2003, the State Tax Inspectorate (hereinafter – STI) appealed to the Commercial Court of Kiev with a claim to the company “Y” and “TDM” on the Recognition agreement between them, May 11, 2001 commission agreement to be invalid, contrary to the interests of the state, and recovery with “Y” just feed them to the transaction at $ 9 million USD in revenue of the state on the basis of Article 49 of the Civil Code of Ukraine. Read more