Joint responsibility for creditors claims’ dissatisfaction in bankruptcy in Ukraine. Liability of the owner and director for non-payment of debts. Kyiv, 2017.

Read more

A debt for services has been recovered with the citizen of Italy as a liability for legal entity-non-resident.

Pysarenko Law Office has completed the litigation on behalf of Ukrainian client on recovery of payment for advisory services rendered regarding procedures of establishment and operation of technical oils extraction plant in Ukraine. Services were provided to a legal entity-resident of Italy. The debt for specific services has been charged in full with the citizen of Italy in order of joint and several liability for Italian legal entity as there is not jurisdiction of Ukrainian courts on juridical persons-non-residents. Pysarenko Law Office Services Contacts

Enforcement of court decree was cancelled and seizure on 440 000 UAH revoked by the Pysarenko Law Office services.

With our legal support a division of state enforcement service has cancelled enforcement proceedings of the judgment against the client. A debt was not collected. Seizure on the client property and funds was removed. Bank accounts were unlocked. Pysarenko Law Office Services Contacts

UAH 12 mln. was adjudged to our client’s favor from shareholders of a liquidated debtor

Using loopholes in laws, the legal entity-debtor assets were alienated by it’s owners resulting debts to client were not repaid in bankruptcy proceedings. Commercial court of Kyiv has approved a rare judgement in judicial practice on imposition of joint and several liability for the enterprise unpaid debts on it’s shareholders-natural persons. The case was heard for 2.8 years in 6 courts of 3 instances. Enforcement of responsibility on citizens of the Russian Federation and Ukraine in amount of 12,1 UAH million is ahead. Pysarenko Law Office Services Contacts

Dispute settlement between software developer and bank

A legal support for dispute on payment collection for development, implementation and maintenance of an integrated software for bank activities and reporting was performed. A course of action was planned, legal claims were developed and objections to the bank pretensions were substantiated. Pysarenko Law Office Services Contacts

The Supreme economic court of Ukraine upheld our complaint.

The cassation, filed on behalf of the Dutch client, for retrial of the Ukrainian debtor’s bankruptcy case on a basis of new circumstances was satisfied by the Supreme economic court of Ukraine in full.
In the result, the case was submitted to the Economic court of Poltavska oblast and not to the court at the location of the bankrupt. SECU agreed with cassation arguments about impossibility of proceedings the case by the judges of the Economic court of Sumska oblast that do not have a specialization in bankruptcy. The case shall have been reconsidered so that satisfy the client’s pecuniary interest. The case is being judged since 2012.  Pysarenko Law Office    Services   Contacts

Default of the debts/credits payment for the reason of bankruptcy in Ukraine. Kyiv, 2012. Pravovyi tyzhden’ legal practice newspaper 13.11.2012

Oleksandr Pysarenko, attorney at law, MBA degree.

Owners an finance management of enterprises in Ukraine often ask– what shall they do if current debts to creditors (including investors, suppliers and bank loans) overdraw the total value of property of the enterprise, i.e. there are no resources to pay off Read more

“Ukrferrum” LLC has been advocated by The Law Office at Commercial Court of Luganska Oblast

The Law Office acted for Ukrferrum Company in the Commercial court of the Lugansk Region in proceedings brought by the client against Alchevsk metallurgical complex to recover the debt for slag by-products supplied in 2008-2010. The parties made a settlement but failed to perform it. The court made a judgment in favour of the claimant, and the judgment was paid by the debtor.

The Law Office succeeded in defending BMT UA against the State Affairs Management Department

The Law Office succeeded in defending claims brought by BMT UA against the State Affairs Management Department, with the State Treasury of Ukraine, Ministry for Health Services of Ukraine as third parties, to collect a debt for medical sterilisation equipment, penalties, inflation rate, and statutory interest of 3,335,702.38 in aggregate.  The court found in favour of the claimant.